How criminal networks penetrate U.S. corporate systems: Why entity links matter

November 21, 2025

Recent investigations into Brazil’s most powerful criminal organisation, the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC), reveal a glaring weakness in global anti–money laundering systems as even highly visible, publicly accused criminal actors appear to have built legitimate corporate footprints in the United States.

A C4ADS report titled "Billion-Dollar Blind Spot" uncovers how alleged PCC operatives — including individuals investigated for drug trafficking, international money laundering, and political financing — maintained active companies in Florida, accessing U.S. financial infrastructure with ease. These findings highlight an uncomfortable truth: criminal networks rely not on sophisticated new loopholes, but on the absence of comprehensive, connected, cross-jurisdictional data.


Criminal Networks Exploit Data Gaps—Not Just Legal Gaps


Consider the Bozhanaj–Cazula network. Two individuals—Marinel Bozhanaj and Edenilson Sebastião Cazula—were each independently scrutinised by Brazilian authorities for alleged involvement in cocaine trafficking and large-scale money laundering. Yet C4ADS shows that the two men quietly appeared together in Florida’s corporate registry, jointly establishing Bozhanaj Group Corporation in Miami in 2023.


Public filings alone indicated:


  • a shared company
  • shared addresses with other companies controlled by their family members
  • a continued operational presence in the United States despite ongoing criminal investigations abroad


The issue is not that the data didn’t exist. The issue is that no single system connects the dots.


The PCC’s Fintech Laundering Scheme Shows Why Entity Linkages Matter


A second example—the Yamawaki network—demonstrates the scale of risk created by fragmented data.

João Gabriel de Mello Yamawaki, a Brazilian businessman arrested in 2024, allegedly led a laundering scheme that moved 8.6 billion reais (approx. USD 1.75 billion) using fintechs and an ecosystem of front companies. Yet years earlier, he had already registered two companies in Florida (Las Americas USA LLC and Unique Business USA LLC) with officers linked to Brazilian municipal political structures and to a Brazil-registered digital payments company he controlled.


These cross-border ties were visible only if one could simultaneously access:


  • Brazil’s corporate databases
  • Florida state corporate filings
  • fintech regulatory data
  • judicial records
  • political finance disclosures


Such connections require entity resolution across multiple data types and jurisdictions — a capability most organisations simply do not have.


Why These Cases Prove the Need for Unique Data


The PCC examples illustrate several systemic weaknesses that criminals exploit:


1. Corporate registries operate in silos


Florida had no visibility into ongoing criminal investigations abroad. Brazil had no visibility into U.S. company formations. Evidencity's unique data can bridge this by integrating corporate records across dozens of countries into one unified dataset.


2. Public records are often technically accessible but practically unusable


Florida’s Sunbiz records, Brazilian corporate filings, Panama Papers leaks, and political finance disclosures exist, but none speak to each other. Evidencity’s relationship mapping tools turn scattered data into a coherent investigative picture.


3. Criminal networks abuse legitimate structures


Shell companies, family-run LLCs, front import–export firms, and fintech intermediaries are all types of companies that the PCC uses. These are the same tools ordinary businesses use. That means identifying risk requires pattern recognition, not just keyword searches. Evidencity’s team of analysts and proprietary methods flag patterns such as shared addresses, repeated officer overlaps, and cross-border company clusters.


By providing a unified, cross-border, multi-source data environment, we make it possible to detect:


  • hidden corporate relationships
  • company ecosystems
  • political infiltration patterns
  • cross-jurisdictional laundering conduits


Discover more about Evidencity's unique data: https://www.evidencity.com/uniquedata

After an eight-month export ban that rattled global supply chains, Kinshasa replaced the ban with a
November 12, 2025
After an eight-month export ban that rattled global supply chains, Kinshasa replaced the ban with a cobalt export quota system — a move designed to stabilise prices, strengthen state oversight, and formalise trade.
November 5, 2025
Canada has released its second annual report under the Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act , covering the 2025 reporting cycle. The results provide an important barometer of corporate preparedness for human rights due diligence, and a clear signal for organisations operating globally.
October 9, 2025
The October 2025 investigation by The Sentry into Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) exposed a sophisticated business ecosystem that stretches from Darfur’s gold mines to company registers in Dubai. Far from being an informal smuggling chain, the network resembled a distributed corporate structure — populated by real directors, legitimate-looking licences, and adaptive ownership. It demonstrates how paramilitary power in the 2020s relies less on weapons or ideology, and more on access to global markets and the ability to conceal that access through data-visible intermediaries.
More Posts